As the nation clocks back in after the UK Mayday bank holiday, a small band of fifty-something artsy types are heading in to work with their heads spinning with rediscovered memories, friendships resumed, and a strange feeling that someone just ‘switched us off and switched us back on again’ and the last three decades are re-booting on the flickering green amstrad of our dusty middle aged minds.
For this weekend marked the thirty year reunion of the graduation classes 1982, 83 and 84, of the Manchester University Drama Department.
Of course, it was wonderful to see old friends, and even to see people to whom one hadn’t been particularly close, to share stories, anecdotes, long hidden secrets, wonderful news of the the intervening three decades – relationships, careers, children – and to put that formative time into some kind of context.
When Tony Johnson (now a highly regarded teacher) addressed the gathering in the bar of Contact Theatre (now majorly refurbished since the days of Richard Williams’s actually rather exciting repertory company – by today’s standards), one of the first things he said was ‘sorry’ – and there was an almost unconscious, but cathartic murmur of recognition. For my part, I’d started dreaming about this reunion about a month ago, because mingled with the visceral excitement of digging out old photographs of the shows I’d directed and acted in, and cassette tapes of the songs I’d written, came some toe curling memories too; of mistakes made, petty jealousies, pointless rivalries, obsessional love affairs (bordering on the dysfunctional) and general bad behaviour.
But in that moment – that ‘sorry’, that murmur – also came the realisation that there was no point apologising for, or punishing, or actually feeling any kind of regret for the mistakes of one’s 19 year old self. Because, cliched though it may sound, that’s what mistakes are for. And as Tony said, at 19, he felt out of place, frightened, excited, fucked up – and the great joy of getting older is that you realise that everyone else was as frightened, excited and fucked up as you were. It was that maelstrom of post teenage angst and ambition that made us what we are.
Of course this is true for all generations; we didn’t invent growing up, and we see our own kids, or young relatives, going through many of the same things. But there was something about our experience that was absolutely unique to that time, and that has something to say about the state of university education today. A lot of people spoke on Sunday about the loose form the degree took, whereby one could mix and match how much of the course one actually engaged in, as long as you traded it for creativity in other areas. So in my own three years at Manchester, I skipped an awful lot of lectures, and busked an awful lot of essays and tutorials, but I wasn’t just getting stoned, I was also out with the rest of the gang writing, directing, acting, composing, lighting for dozens of shows. When I got back from the reunion I tried to count them up… I reckon I did about thirty in the three years I was there. I work with students today who boast that they’ve done three shows in a year. Maybe ten in their whole university career.
The creative jewel in Manchester Drama Department’s raggedy paper crown was Monday night studio group, whereby the very basic Stephen Joseph studio was at the exclusive beck and call of the drama students, to put on any kind of drama events we wanted. Many were terrible, some were great, but they were all ambitious… it was our playground. It was the root of everything I do today.
Imagine trying to sell the idea of such a ‘playground’ to an academic establishment today? How could such a shambolic approach possibly be justified? After all, the students are paying £9000 per year, plus borrowing through the nose just to live. There are targets, modules, highly regulated contact time (academics, please supply your own jargon here)…. and how can you justify a performance space that doesn’t have at least some commercial income stream… not to mention health and safety. And even if you did provide some kind of fantastic romper room for creative students, they couldn’t actually use it because any time they’re not studying, they’re working in bars til two in the morning trying to support themselves. And weekends aren’t available to rehearse (as I discovered recently directing at The Arden theatre School) because everyone’s working in retail.
Of course, in our salad days (strictly iceberg lettuce, you understand – rocket hadn’t been invented) there were no tuition fees, and there were also full maintenance grants, and, get this, in the holidays you could claim housing benefit if you didn’t go home. These days – if such a thing were possible, which it isn’t – you would be labeled a student scrounger. Why should students get ANYTHING? After all, having a degree will add tens of thousands of pounds to a young person’s annual earning capacity.
Thank you for that, Tony Blair, you war mongering philistine twat.
How sad that that era has been demonised in the public consciousness as ill disciplined, liberal failure.
The truth is, for a few extra grand from the tax payer (which I have repaid many times over since then) I worked (and played) harder than I have ever done in my whole life. It was a system that produced hundreds of wonderful theatre and arts practitioners, and Manchester alone can boast from that period Ben Elton, Rik Mayall, Adrian Edmonson, Actor Paul Bradley, BBC Radio comedy supremo Caroline Raphael, Theatre Director Lawrence Boswell, Actress and writer Meera Syal, director Polly Teale, Trevor & Simon, Comedian Tony Hawks (although he only stayed for a few weeks), Arts Producer Rachel Clare, Doon Mackichen, an assistant to Doctor Who (Sophie Aldred), music journalist and writer Nick Coleman, playwright Charlotte Keatley, James’s front man Tim Booth, and many, many, many more… teachers, drama practitioners, poets, producers, film makers, therapists, lighting designers, costume supervisors… and ME!!!
Of course, I’m not saying that today’s crop of students won’t produce many significant players – they will – but I do know – because I work with them – that today’s graduates emerge from university with far less hands on experience, far less ability for guerrilla problem solving, with even more left to learn than we did. They’re paying a small fortune, and getting less for it. The Blair government pursued an entirely reductive argument that the bit of paper that says ‘BA Hons’ is somehow the point of going to university.
It isn’t. It’s the very least important thing – especially if you are pursuing a highly lucrative, tax earning, exchequer boosting career in the arts.
The most important thing to do at university, is just that…. ‘do’.
And god bless our lecturers and tutors from thirty years back – Viv Gardner, Nick Roddick, David Mayer, George Taylor, Tony Jackson, Ken Richards, Wylie Longmore and all the rest – for just letting get on with it, teaching us some stuff, and giving us a prod in the right direction when we needed it, and every now and again, letting us fail…. and all of it on the taxpayer’s tab.
Because believe it or not, the taxpayer has been the net beneficiary.
(check out what my old housemate, Jacqueline Saphra has to say about it in her lovely blog…)
Well said, Martin. Bang on the money. We were extraordinarily fortunate.
And I feel extraordinarily sad I was unable to make this weekend. Instead I have spent three sleepless nights watching bits of memory constellate in my head in twinkly fragments, finding no stability in proper retrospect or settling into a proper order. Just wooshing back and forth and twinkling. Very strange.
Hmm. I’d let most of it go – or so I thought – but it’s still in there, like bits of God and ‘The Woodentops’ and the Rolling Stones when they were good.
Well done, everyone, for making the most of it.
Thanks Nick, we all missed you!
Funnily enough, I’d been searching for an animatable model of what we now laughingly call ‘the post-war consensus’ – that thing that people of our generation benefitted from so comprehensively and yet so blithely (and is now lost forever) – and it never occured to me that I’d lived it, at Manchester, with you lot.
Bollocks. Too late now.
On the other hand, a novel set in a red-brick university drama dept in the early 1980s would have only limited appeal, I feel.
Great stuff Martin. Well put indeed. What lucky, lucky people we were
to be in the right place at the right time x
Bit of a rant coming up…
Damn right, Martin. Kids enter school inquisitive and desperate to learn. There are teachers out there who want to teach. But the system fails kids and teachers: it is one of diminishing returns, as the micro-management endured by both parties – incrementally increased as the years progress – narrows rather than broadens education. Schools are under constant pressure to provide good grades and pupils are drilled accordingly. There is little opportunity for intellectual curiosity in the classroom.
In our neo-liberal times, schools are ‘knowledge providers’ and pupils proto-‘clients’, groomed for the neo-liberal market, learning and, worse, internalizing its perfidious vocabulary. The same is true at higher university level, with the nominal client status of the pupil ‘upgraded’ to the actual client status of the student, complete with fees and loans. Knowledge, streamlined and sanitized, is then duly transferred but at what price –financial and educational?
Unfortunately this is symptomatic of a much wider imposition of such paradigms on institutions previously considered to be of sufficient intrinsic value (such as the NHS) to be sheltered from market forces. Society is starting to unravel at the seams: the sick get sicker, the poor poorer, the needy needier. While the rich, of course, get richer. Social inequality is increasing as social mobility is decreasing. The elites are just as entrenched as they always were. It is clear for all to see: the market has no clothes, turbo capitalism is naked. Yet what does the great British public do? Bakes scones and votes for Ukip. And what of the Left? It dons the market’s clothes and speaks its perfidious language, too timid, too complicit to take a moral stance. Oh for some of the spirit of ’84. Just once in a while.
(So Nick, how about that novel? 🙂
It’s written. And everything that ever mattered to anyone about anything is in it.
Also very sorry not to have been able to come. Beautifully written piece Martin that absolutely captures what was so wonderful about our time in Manchester and also what is wrong with the current system. I have mentored recent graduates from the Drama department and they do know what they have missed. Without the Studio, without Summer Company, without Manchester Umbrella Touring Theatre I would never have had the career I’ve had and while I would suggest you don’t believe everything you read about BBC salaries, having been here for 30 years now, I’ve certainly paid back my time at University over and over and over again.
The other unintended consequence of tuition fees is that it appears to have demotivated a significant chunk of the student body. I’m not exclusively talking about Manchester University Drama Department here, but quite a few of the students I work with in similar or related drama courses have the attitude that because they are paying so much money for the privilege then (quite reasonably) they feel that everything should be provided for them. And it makes sense on the surface… ‘If I’m paying £30-50k in fees and subsistence then why should I go out and have to make my own projects, create my own learning experiences on top of that?’
So I hear a lot of whinging about how little they’re getting for their money (which is true) but only occasionally encounter groups of students who translate that into getting off their own backsides and doing stuff themselves.
I’m not blaming them, or accusing them of laziness or wilful lack of motivation, I’m simply saying that the system has created a monstrous transaction that, rather than focusing minds, actually acts as a reductive distraction.